The July 2007 issue of Laptop magazine (one of the best reads for lawyers interested in mobile computing) contains a short, but provocative, article about Google Apps. It is actually a cost comparison between Google Apps Premier Edition and Microsoft Office. In short, Google Apps Premier offers much of the functionality of MS Office at a fraction of the cost.
What is Google Apps Premier? Essentially, it is the concept of "software as a service" taken to a high level. Instead of a typical office suite installed on the hard drive of your PC or server, your word processor, email program, calendar software, etc., run in your web browser and actually exist on-line at Google's secure servers. You can import and export (download or upload) files and data to and from Google Apps. I exported my MS Outlook contacts and calendar to standard .csv (comma separated value) format and imported them into Google Apps without a problem. You can also upload and download MS Word files (MS Word document templates will soon be added to the file formats supported by Google Apps).
The advantages of the software as a service model are many. There is no software to buy, install, maintain and upgrade on your PC. And you can access your documents, calendar, email, etc., from any computer (or other device) with Internet access anywhere in the world. And it is dirt cheap.
There are some disadvantages as well. If you lack an Internet connection, you are dead in the water. Also, at the present time there will be no integration with practice management or documents assembly programs (although that could come as the technology matures and browser-based applications become commonplace.
Google Apps Premier is only $50 per user per year, and there is a 30 day free trial. Many solo and small firms may be able to get by with the free standard version of Google Apps (on which I have been running my own informal tests). I think we are seeing the future of law office computing, and it is the software as a service model. Once wireless high-speed Internet access becomes widespread and the cost falls to current cable/dsl levels (which could happen in the next couple of years), this technology will really take off.
As noted by one of the comments to this post, users of any service that transmits potentially confidential data over the Web should carefully examine the security policy of the provider. This applies not just to Google Apps, but on-line backup services, remote access and control services, etc, on-line payroll services, etc.
The sad truth is that for most solo and small firms, the security risks posed by services such as Google Apps may be the least of their worries. Many small firms fail to use strong passwords on their PC's and networks, never change those passwords, leave passwords on sticky notes attached to monitors, carry unencrypted USB backup flash and hard drives around without proper precautions, leave backup drives and tapes in unsecured locations at their offices, etc.
There are also the low-tech security problems such as inadequate locks and alarm systems, confidential documents thrown-out in trash instead of being shredded, not changing locks when an employee quits of is discharged, misdialed fax numbers, misdirected snail mail, etc. In reality, all of these are more likely to result in a breach of client confidentiality than services such as Google Apps.
But the commenter is right, we do have a lawyer on staff, and it was that lawyer who wrote the post on Google Apps. Mention should have been made of the potential security risks with any on-line service such as Google Apps. Thanks for the reminder.